With everyone talking about how Israel is killing hundreds and thousands of Muslims in Gaza, I had to know more about it. With limited information I felt really bad about it at first, looked at a few pictures, followed by some videos of slaughter of innocent civilians. Now since I am a little biased against Muslims (who isn't these days!) I could not justify someone else killing them, torturing them for no reason. I knew there was more to this. So, I began reading up on it. I knew about the Israel-Palestine conflict and how Israel had to build up a huge military and military intelligence systems to guard itself against its Islamic neighbors.
I read about Humas attacking Israel civilians with 80 rocket launchers. It was rather strange I had never heard of that. For anyone who doesn't know Hamas is a terrorist organization based out of Palestine and they would do anything to hurt an Israeli fly, let alone the people there. So Hamas attacked and Israel attacked back causing a lot of damage of life and property.
Finally to me Israeli retaliation is justified. I am not saying they should kill civilians, or that violence is to be always met by violence. Muslim violence is like a forest fire. Extremist muslims only know how to burn, kill and decapitate humans like they were playing objects. If you could stop or control their violent tendencies at all, it could be only through giving them a piece of their own medicine. It is sad there is so much loss of innocent by-standards on both sides in the process. But if you leave it to Palestine they would get rid of all the Jews in Israel and reclaim "their" land. So what would you rather have? Killing of 100 thousands and millions of people or just a few hundreds. If those were your only two options, what would you pick.
For people asking for justice for Gaza or for it to be saved, ask yourself do you think Israel (IDE) would have attacked Gaza if the Palestinians did not genuinely want to kill them all?
I read about Humas attacking Israel civilians with 80 rocket launchers. It was rather strange I had never heard of that. For anyone who doesn't know Hamas is a terrorist organization based out of Palestine and they would do anything to hurt an Israeli fly, let alone the people there. So Hamas attacked and Israel attacked back causing a lot of damage of life and property.
Finally to me Israeli retaliation is justified. I am not saying they should kill civilians, or that violence is to be always met by violence. Muslim violence is like a forest fire. Extremist muslims only know how to burn, kill and decapitate humans like they were playing objects. If you could stop or control their violent tendencies at all, it could be only through giving them a piece of their own medicine. It is sad there is so much loss of innocent by-standards on both sides in the process. But if you leave it to Palestine they would get rid of all the Jews in Israel and reclaim "their" land. So what would you rather have? Killing of 100 thousands and millions of people or just a few hundreds. If those were your only two options, what would you pick.
For people asking for justice for Gaza or for it to be saved, ask yourself do you think Israel (IDE) would have attacked Gaza if the Palestinians did not genuinely want to kill them all?
No comments:
Post a Comment